A Multi-Level Framework for Responsible Student–AI Collaboration

Team name: Triple Five

Use of AI tools : Yes

Which tool(s) did you use?  ChatGPT

For what purpose(s)?
Refine the structure, create presentation and video editing.

How did these tools support your work?
It helped us save time during video editing.

External feedback & contributions:
1.⁠ ⁠Sarbanes Tassos [Professor of Computer Science at Pace University.]  Mentoring
2.⁠ ⁠Dr. Christelle Scharff  [Professor of Computer Science at Pace University. She has a Ph.D. in Symbolic Artificial Intelligence from INRIA (French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation) in France.] comments
3.⁠ ⁠Eline VIVET MALADRY (Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Management Sciences at Université Paris Cité)  comments
4.  Alexandra Prégent ( Keynote speaker: Ethics of AI)

Initial contribution: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T92JL4RdAqsTJtVCrdd9_e4KVsOj2P66/view

Final contribution: https://drive.google.com/file/d/14qGAyQpF0eXzZ5p0D18U6f41SVlbPZzy/view

Reflection on the process and explain how your contribution evolved during Phase 2:
From the initial proposal to the final, it was a journey of understanding AI to understanding the usage of AI by students. We started with a hypothesis about AI usage and its effects on students, and it evolved towards a deep understanding that it’s not just a tool but a technology, with which a partnership can make tremendous changes. We introduced a solution to a problem in the AI industry, i.e. AI hallucination. This proposal can benefit all industries, students, and mankind for a better world.

What feedback (comments, discussions, expert inputs, keynotes) influenced your work?

1) It would be useful to specify the scope of your analysis. Are you referring to all uses of AI by students, or to specific uses (learning, writing, problem-solving, etc.)? This is important in order to avoid overgeneralization. If possible, you could adopt a more situated approach: which uses, in which contexts, and with what effects?

2) You mobilize the notions of dependence and “cognitive atrophy” very effectively. These are indeed conceptually strong notions. Do you also plan to analyze your topic through the lens of cognitive delegation or technologies as extensions of cognition?

3) Your proposals are very rich—well done! They address multiple levels: students, universities, companies, and public authorities. In your presentation, it would be valuable to clearly distinguish between these different levels of analysis.

4) Regarding your proposal for an ethical partnership, I understand that it involves collaboration with companies. What incentives could be introduced to ensure that this does not remain a purely normative proposal that is difficult to implement? Are there already comparable initiatives?

5) You are mentioning that students present hallucinations as one of the problems. This is a very clear problem but there are more.

6) Did your survey present other issues? If no, this showcases that students do not understand all the issues of AI. Did you administer the survey to all types of majors? Art and humanities students may have different perspectives

What changes did you make as a result?

With the results and proposal, we provide a step towards AI partnering and not policing AI. AI should not replace students’ thinking. It should make them powerful to think better and solve the hidden problems of the universe by helping students think better.

How did this process strengthen your final proposal?

•⁠  ⁠We have clarified the scope of AI usage contexts

•⁠  ⁠We have incorporated cognitive delegation and extended cognition frameworks

•⁠  ⁠We have structured your contribution across four stakeholder levels

•⁠  ⁠We have strengthened the implementation feasibility and incentives

 Video pitch : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1W8vq1-372ODZQ_EZ18MnypgG2ooBXzvz/edit?slide=id.p1#slide=id.p1